Do You Need Legal Help?
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly.
* required fields.
Drivers arrested on suspicion of DUI / DWI in California are often
unaware that the charge poses an immediate threat to their driver’s
license. Accused drunk drivers have just 10 days after arrest to
request a Department of Motor Vehicles hearing or have their licenses
automatically suspended. However, the DMV action can be challenged. The experienced defense lawyers
at The Kavinoky Law Firm have the skills needed to aggressively
fight a D.M.V. action in a California driving under the influence
case and protect the accused driver’s rights.
The process involved in a Department
of Motor Vehicles administrative per se, or APS hearing, is
fairly straightforward. Unlike the criminal case triggered by a
California driving while intoxicated arrest, the DMV case focuses
on whether the driver had a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .08 percent
or greater, not whether the driver was impaired by alcohol or drugs.
Therefore, in order to suspend a driver’s license, the DMV
hearing officer must establish just three facts – that police
had probable cause to believe a crime was committed, that the arrest
was lawful, and that the driver had a BAC that exceeded the legal
limit.
One aspect of a California Department of Motor Vehicles APS hearing
is extremely unusual – the role
of the D.M.V. hearing officer. The hearing officer serves as
both judge and prosecutor. This means that the individual introducing
evidence against the accused drunk driver and the individual weighing
that evidence are the same person.
The types of issues covered during a D.M.V. APS hearing depend
on whether the driver submitted
to a chemical test after arrest to determine his or her blood
alcohol content (BAC), or refused
the test.
If the driver is alleged to have refused
a chemical test, it’s important to determine whether police
issued a warning about the repercussions of a chemical test refusal,
and whether or not the driver again refused to take the test.
If the accused drunk driver was under
21 at the time of arrest, additional issues will arise at the
hearing. Although the legal limit for driving is now .08 percent
BAC in all 50 states, a driver who is under 21 can have his or her
license suspended by the DMV with a BAC of just .05 percent or greater.
If the driver’s DMV hearing is unsuccessful, the consequences
will also depend on whether or not the motorist submitted to a chemical
test after arrest. A driver who refused
a chemical test will receive a longer license suspension after
an unsuccessful D.M.V. hearing than one who submitted to a test of the blood, breath or urine.
The license suspensions imposed by the DMV if the driver’s
hearing is unsuccessful can be severe – for a first
offense, the driver will lose his or her license for four months,
with the possibility of getting a restricted license to drive to
work. Motorists facing a first offense who refused
to take a chemical test will lose their driver’s licenses
for one year, without the option of obtaining a restricted license.
For multiple driving under the influence arrests that occur within a 10-year span, the consequences are even greater. On a second offense, the driver’s license is suspended for one year, or two years if the driver refused a chemical test. On a third offense, the license is suspended for three years.
Fortunately, an unsuccessful Department of Motor Vehicles APS hearing
stemming from a California drunk driving arrest can be appealed.
There are two options available to appeal an unsuccessful DMV hearing
– a request for administrative
review, or a writ of mandate.
Either action may result in the DMV hearing officer’s decision
being overturned, and the driver’s license being restored.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles will act fast to suspend
a driver’s license following a DUI / DWI arrest, but the driver’s
loss of privileges can be avoided with the help of a top lawyer. The skilled drunk driving defense attorneys
at The Kavinoky Law Firm will aggressively defend individuals
accused of driving while intoxicated at their DMV hearings and fight
to protect their licenses. |